Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘European Imperialism’ Category

المشروع الصهيونى العالمى و خدعة الديموقراطية


غُلَافُ كِتَابِ الْخِدْعَةِ الْصُّهْيُودِيمُوقْرَاطِيَّةِ VII

 لقراءة الكتاب إضغط على الرابط التالى

الْمَشْرُوعُ الْصُّهْيُونِىُّ الْعَالَمِىُّ وَ خُدْعَةُ الْدِّيمُوقْرَاطِيَّةِ

تم توقيع عقد نشر الكتاب ورقيا مع المكتبة الأكاديمية – 121 شارع التحرير بالدقى، القاهرة، مصر، يوم 3 مارس 2015، و يحظر نشر أو إستنساخ أى فقرات من هذا الكتاب بدون إذن كتابى من الناشر

 

 

غ الصهيونية copy.jpg

Read Full Post »


 

American Terrorism!

 

American Democracy???

 

Dr. Ahmed El-Meadawy

7 November 2007

 

Slaughtering the Natives:

 

        America was created by massacring the aboriginal people and stealing their land, after they have inhabited the American Continents for 20,000 years. When Christopher Columbus invaded America in 1492, there were 40-90 million natives. 2-18 lived in North America, and the remaining lived in Central and South America. In 1900, only 250,000 survived the slaughter in the USA. 100,000 lived in Canada. The European invaders brought new diseases to the natives that helped eliminating them. This is why invading Palestine by the Jewish immigrants, stealing their land, killing, and starving the Palestinians does not contradict with the western democratic civilized European/American imperialist thinking.

 

Enslaving Humans:

 

        In 1562, the Portuguese started the profitable slave trade, and competed with the Spanish, French, Dutch, and English in enslaving inhabitants of Western Africa to work in the new American colonies, of course, for free. By 1672, the English defeated all their competitors in the “Black Gold” trade. Female and male slaves and children were transported separated from each other, completely naked, and packed without any room for movement until arriving to the slavery landAmerica”. On the transporting ships, they stretched their hands to food upon sign from their holders, and swallowed upon another signal. When the slaves load arrived at the eastern coasts of America (Maryland and Virginia), slaves were offered to the buyers naked. Mothers and children were sold to different masters using the wipes. Slaves were offered the least amounts and worst quality of food, allowed the least period of time to sleep, and forced to work hard long hours. Many died. Wiping was the way to force them accepting their slavery status. They had to do whatever their masters wanted them to do. Punishment for escaping was wiping, burning, and confinement in chains. Slaves were used in farming and mining. America’s wealth was created from the sweat of the African slaves’ free work. Slaves’ children were slaves automatically. White masters took them to work inside their homes. Slaves remained slaves for life according to the American laws. They were inherited as possessions. They did not have the right to own anything. In 1638, the price of an African slave was $27.00, and the daily wage of a European worker was 70 cents.

 

      European invaders of the African Continent encouraged local tribes to wage wars against each other and then selling the prisoners as slaves. Another way was kidnapping peaceful inhabitants, and hiring Africans to manage the slavery process. European invaders gave African collaborators weapons to defeat their foes and sell the defeated prisoners. Collaborators feared becoming slaves themselves, if they had not collaborated with the Europeans. 50% of the African prisoners died during enslaving and shipping them to America.

 

      European colonial masters convinced themselves that enslaving the Africans and forcing them to Christianity is better than leaving them for their indigenous religions and to live in peace. The criminal, thieve, or murderer does not say he/she is a criminal, but find some moral reasons for committing crimes.

 

      Americans have always believed that America is the land of freedom and equality of citizens although they enslaved 10-11 million Africans. Anyhow, the slaves were not citizens. America would not have achieved such economical success without enslaving the African people.

 

      Enslaving Africans encouraged the Europeans to believe that the white man is superior to others. This helped the spread of racism in the modern time. The white masters taught their slaves to despise their original African culture and history. This led the Europeans to divide humans into different races to find a moral reason for invading, colonizing and enslaving other humans. Europeans/Americans wanted, also, to be morally superior.

 

      Between 1861 and 1870, the American slaves were freed and given citizenship and the right to vote (only for men) after long and bitter struggle for freedom. White Americans in the southern states hated to be equal to their former slaves and used terror to prevent implementing the new laws and to separate the Africans from the white Americans. They wanted them to stay with the aboriginal people at the bottom of the society. Laws were produced to prohibit African Americans from being in the same place with white Americans and practicing the same activities. This segregation lasted until the sixties of the last century.

 

The Nuclear Terror:

 

         The USA, under President .Harry Truman, has been the only country/nation that has used atomic bombs against another nation. The first bomb was dropped on the seventh largest Japanese city, Hiroshima, on 6 August 1945. 60,000-70,000 were killed instantly and 140,000 were wounded. The fatal atomic radiation reached 100,000 civilians. Another 70,000 died during the following five years.

 

       A second nuclear bomb was dropped on Nagasaki on 9 August of the same year. 42,000 died immediately, and 40,000 received the lethal atomic radiation. The number of the dead reached 70,000 by the end of the year.

 

       The USA spent $2 billion on the atomic bomb research. American, British, Canadian, and Jewish scientists were involved. 120,000 workers contributed to the project in total. The Germans were lucky to have been defeated, before the American atomic bomb was ready for use.

 

Six Million Casualties of the Vietnam War!

 

       The American governments have always justified all their imperial wars against other nations with the banner of fighting for freedom. This has resulted in 6 million American, Vietnamese, and other Asian dead, wounded, or disabled. 58226 American soldiers were killed; another 304,000 were injured or disabled. The war lasted 11 years (1965-1975), and ended by the humiliating defeat of the American mighty military by a poor and underdeveloped nation. The cost for the American tax payers was $150,000 billion. Profits went to the weapon producers and banks that lent the government the money to finance its wars, and to the politicians working on behalf of the war profiteers. The Pentagon, also, likes wars to keep busy and to test its new weapons in the real life. It seems that what prevented the American Government from using nuclear weapons to save itself from the humiliating defeat was the possession of the same weapons by the Soviet Union and China, which were Vietnamese allies. This was the Cold War policy of mutual deterrence. A superpower could not use its arsenal of weapons of mass destruction without expecting retaliation from the other superpower of the same kind.

 

Terrorizing the Arabs:

 

         The Europeans invaded what they have called the Americas, slaughtered most of the aboriginal inhabitants, stole their lands, and enslaved West Africans to create their wealth for free. This barbaric habit included the theft of Palestine, killing its native inhabitants, throwing them out of their inherited land, allowing Jewish migrants to replace, murder, steal, torture, starve, and humiliate them during the past 60 years. The new imperial body has been named Israel, which has killed with cooperation of the Europeans and Americans over 100,000 Palestinians, since 1948, to force them out of their land.

 

       The American, European, and Israeli plan for the Arabs and their lands is long and complicated. On 19 March 2003, the United States and many of its European allies invaded Iraq to prevent it from possessing weapons of mass destruction, but the invaders have not found such weapons, although the American Government has assured the entire World of the evidence that Iraq had acquired them. The war for the illusive weapons of mass destruction has killed 3842 of the American soldiers and 665,000 Iraqis (31 October 2007). 4.5 million Iraqis have become displaced inside and outside Iraq. Those American and European killers are very proud of their democracy and respect of human rights. They believe that they are morally superior to other nations because of that. Wars for oil and money do not reconcile with human rights, but the democratic mass media make it possible. Freedom of press and freedom of expression within the democratic world make it possible to reconcile the imperialist western free World policies of killing and destroying other countries and nations for the oil with respect of human rights, freedom and democracy. The reason for the declared wars should be more diplomatic than the truth, such as preventing rogue regimes from possessing weapons of mass destruction and democratizing undemocratic countries and nations. But, what is wrong with possessing weapons of mass destruction? The Americans and Europeans give themselves the right to possess them, and the right to destroy others. Others do not have the right to defend themselves, and are not mature enough to play with such dangerous weapons. The American and European mass media make the point clear. Freedom of press is just one way. Of course, others are free to express their opinions under the shower, outside the mass media that constitute the most effective tool of the democratic game. American and European democracy and free media have reconciled human rights and civility with wars, massacres, destruction of countries, economies, and nations. American and European politicians and officials stand in front of the “free media” to lecture the entire World about democracy, human rights, freedom of press and expression. All of us, citizens of the same World listen carefully and learn from the masters like monkeys.

 

       The same “free pressdoes not show you the real suffer of the wars’ victims in Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan. You do not see the dead, mutilated, and disabled from the aggressors and the victims alike. Remember, it is a free media one way only. It shows only the suffer of the victims of the World Trade Centre, but not that of anyone else. The citizens of the so called free world fail to understand the brutality of the attackers. The advertised reason for that is not to offend the sensitive feelings of the monkeys receiving the free education (brain wash). The same monkeys go to the poles to vote for their leaders, according to the education received from the media. They vote for politicians who send their sons and daughters to murder and destroy, to get killed and disabled for life, take their tax money and spend it on wars that profit a very few of the big companies and politicians, reduce social services and welfare of the society, and practice all sorts of corruption unpublished by the free media. Soldiers of the aggressors are heroes, not murderers. Their victims, well, what victims? No one talks about them. Invasion is liberation, aggression is freedom, and lying is democracy and freedom of press and expression.

 

       Wars are crimes, unless they are literally, defensive. Wars destroy life, nations, communities, countries, and economies. Wars do not reconcile with respect for human rights and freedoms. Wars are violation of human rights and freedom.

 

Destruction of Afghanistan:

 

         With help of the Saudi and Pakistani intelligent services, the CIA created the Moslem fighters (Mujahedeen) in Afghanistan to destabilize the Communist Regime that took power in Afghanistan in 1978 and the Soviet occupation supporting that regime. This project included recruiting and training thousands of Moslem youth from outside Afghanistan including Osama Ben Laden. The costs were hundreds of millions of dollars. On 7 October 2001, the USA invaded that poor country to allow the American oil companies, especially Halliburton, which was led by Dick Chaney (the current American Vice President), to put their hands on the oil and gas reserves of the Caspian Sea by building a pipe line to transport them through the Afghani land. The Taliban regime, ousted by the invasion, had refused granting the American companies the right to build the mentioned pipe line. Aside of the profits going to the American companies and corrupt politicians, acquiring the Caspian Sea oil and gas reserves secures the oil supply for the growing American economy and its allies, as the Middle East is unstable politically and militarily. Plans to invade Afghanistan started much earlier than the attacks on the World Trade Centre on 11 September 2001. Some believe the 9/11 was an operation that was completely designed and performed by the CIA.

 

The CIA Terrorism:

 

         In 1953, the CIA succeeded in removing the democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister, Muhammad Mosaddeq, as the British coup d’état has failed to eliminate him. He implemented policies increasing his country’s returns from its oil fields at the expense of the BP’s profits, the British oil company that monopolized the production of the Iranian oil. At that time, the importance of the oil for the economies of industrialized nations was obvious for the imperial powers such as Britain and USA. With help of a military coup d’état, the CIA installed Mohamed Reda Bahlawi to act as an Agent for the Americans and its allies. He robbed his nation, killed, tortured the Iranians, and supported the imperialist policies of the USA and its European allies in the Middle East. This resulted in the Iranian revolution in 1979.

 

       In 1954, the CIA removed the democratically elected Guatemalan President using a military coup d’état. The installed client regimes killed over a hundred thousand of the Guatemalans during the next 40 years.

 

       In Haiti, the CIA installed Papa Doc Duvalier, who, also, killed over a hundred thousand Haitians.

 

       In Zaire, the CIA assassinated the democratically elected President Patrice Lumumba and installed Mobutu Sese Seko, who murdered and robbed his people.

 

       In 1963, the CIA played a key role in the assassination of the American President John F. Kennedy. In the same year, it removed the democratically elected President of the Dominican Republic, Juan Bosch.

 

       In 1964, the CIA removed the democratically elected Ecuadorian President, Arosemana. In the same year, the CIA used the usual military coup d’état to remove the Brazilian democratically elected Joao Goulart government, and installed a client regime. It trained assassination teams for that regime to remove dissidents.

 

       In 1967, the CIA removed the democratically elected Indonesian President, Sukarno, because he cofounded the Non-Aligned Movement. For being not an American ally, the CIA financed and supported a coup d’état led by General Suharto that ousted President Sukarno. The allied General with America killed 0.5-1 million Indonesians in support of the American policies.

 

       In 1967, another CIA coup d’état installed a military regime in Greece, that murdered and tortured dissidents. The Greek Ambassador in Washington protested to President Lyndon B. Johnson, who replied: “Fuck your parliament and your constitution”. Johnson was one of the conspirators who assassinated the former American President John F. Kennedy.

 

In Bolivia, the CIA assassinated Che Guevara.

 

       In 1975, the CIA replaced the democratically elected Chilean President Salvador Allende and replaced him with General Augusto Pinochet, who murdered 3,000 dissidents and tortured tens of thousands.

 

       The CIA achievements are more than the above mentioned examples, but prove “the democratic commitment” of the American state to democracy and respect of human rights in all parts of the world. What matters really for the American policy makers is not  the American interests but the interests of the few ruling groups of interests, which brain washes the voting majority using the “free” mass media that the interests of the very few are the interests of the whole nation.

 

       Currently, the CIA kidnaps civilians from all parts of the globe, especially allied European countries, and sends them to client regimes in Egypt, Jordan, Morocco, “Syria”, and other countries to be tortured on behalf of the CIA to gain information about American dissidents in the entire world. But, why does not the CIA do the dirty job itself, especially, it is the master, who taught most of the third World regimes the arts of torture? American laws do not allow torture. Notice the level of civilization, civility, sensitivity, and respect of local and international laws by the American rulers.

 

       Former American Presidents, George H. W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, were CIA agents. Hundreds of journalists, also, work for the CIA. But, they provide the public at the same time with the service of free information and holding the Government accountable. CIA employees commit crimes, but are not punished. It is a crime to expose a CIA agent.

 

Democracy???

 

         Europeans immigrated to what they named the Americas and became Americans. They practiced all kinds of terrorism, such as decimating the aboriginal inhabitants and stealing their land, enslaving millions of Africans, and waging wars for financial gains in order to create the present American “civilization” with its democracy, respect of human rights, and freedoms, but only within the USA. However, they call their victims terrorists. European/Americans turned the Middle East into Hell by destroying Palestine, Iraq, and Lebanon, and supporting most third World murderer and corrupt regimes. They call them moderate regimes.

 

       Have a look at democracy from within. It is ruled by three independent authorities: executive, legislative, and juridical. The legislative makes the laws, the executive implements them, and the juridical judges the whole society according to the above mentioned laws. The three parts constitute a legal mafia. Law enforcers, makers and judges are above the law. They do whatever they please. The only control allowed is the free media, which is not free. It is free only for its owners, the financiers who finance members of the above mentioned authorities. The hidden rulers of democracy sit at the top of the pyramid, finance and appoint members of the three authorities, which run the whole society and the world according to the interests of the unseen rulers. This is the big mafia that rules and owns democracy. It is, also, above the law. Do not forget the only control over this legal mafia is the free media owned by the hidden rulers of democracy. The free media brain wash the voting public to vote for members of mentioned mafia, who enforce the interests of the unseen owners of democracy or the legal mafia.

 

       Corruption and anti-corruption forces fight unbalanced fight. The anti-corruption forces succeed few times in uncovering the corrupt mafia “democracy”, but loose most of the battles to the corruption forces armed with money and “free media”.

 

       The American population has suffered form the Vietnam War for 11 years, as almost every family had a dead or disabled soldier. It resisted that war and succeeded in stopping it. The democratic mafia invented a better military system (the professional military), under which members of the most underprivileged classes of the society join the military as well paying jobs. When they die and become disabled, it is very difficult to blame anyone but themselves, as they had joined the military freely. Anyhow, members of the military, the mercenaries, the murderers of other nations’ sons, daughters, and children, are called heroes (free media).

 

       Money is a significant factor of the democratic mafia equation. Candidates with the most donated sums of money, by the illusive rulers, succeed in being elected for posts such as presidents of the state, members of parliament, governors of states, etc. Money, also, owns the mass media, which controls the whole democratic mafia process. In stead of controlling the democratic institutions and its enforcers, the mass media brain wash the public to support whatever policies benefiting the hidden rulers of the legal democratic mafia. Note that politicians and enforcers of the whole democratic process have to repay their financiers, who put them in their posts with their money.

 

       Former President Richard Nixon resigned as it was proven that he was spying on members of the Democratic Party (Watergate). He breached the American laws, as he and every other politician do unpunished. His grave mistake was betraying members of the democratic mafia not the American public. In democracy, there is not punishment for politicians for sending soldiers to their death and mutilation, for destroying other nations for profits, for benefiting few groups of interests at the expense of the majority, etc.

 

       Prosperity, achieved in part by exploiting other less developed nations, such as enslaving the Africans, and forcing coup d’états, helps the minds of the democratic voters to become lazy, as they do not have serious problems to fight for under the influence of the “free” mass media. Other voters feel the sterility of the whole regime, and know that their votes will change nothing, so they do not vote. When significant crises happen such as poverty and suffering form wars, people can affect the direction of the democratic mafia to some extent. But, the democratic mafia is always one step ahead.

 

References:

 

African American and Native American Discrimination from 1864 to 1954. 6 November 2007. Everything. http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1463139

African Americans. MSN Encarta. 6 November 2007. http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761587467/African_Americans.html

B. Davis Schwartz Memorial Library. C.W. Post Campus. The African American: A Journey from Slavery to Freedom. Long Island University. 2 November 2007. http://www.liu.edu/cwis/cwp/library/aaslavry.htm

Chronology on the History of Slavery and Racism from 1619 to 1789. Compiled by Eddie Becker (1999). http://www.innercity.org/holt/slavechron.html

CIA Crimes report.txt. Coldwar Imperialism> News Mine. 5 November 2007. http://newsmine.org/archive/coldwar-imperialism/cia-crimes-report.txt

http://icasualties.org/oif/,31  October 2007

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/10/11/iraq.deaths/, 25 أكتوبر 2007

Jennifer Rosenferg. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Parts 1 and 2). October 30, 2007. About.com:20th Century History. http://history1900s.about.com/od/worldwarii/a/hiroshima.htm

Murray Dobbin. How the West Destroyed Afghanistan. 3 October, 2006. The Tyee.ca. http://thetyee.ca/Views/2006/10/03/Afghanistan/

Nat Hentoff. Europe Shames U.S. Congress. 14 May 2006. The Village Voice. http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0620,hentoff,73206,6.html

Native Americans of North America. http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761570777_8/Native_Americans_of_North_America.html

Patrick Martin. US Planned War in Afghanistan Long before September 11. 20 November 2001. The US War in Afghanistan. World Socialist Web Site. http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/nov2001/afgh-n20.shtml

Sam Smith. House Provides more Cover for CIA Crimes. The Progressive Review. 17 May 1999. Förderverein Informationstechnik und Gesellschaft. http://www.fitug.de/news/newsticker/old/1999/newsticker200599214053.html

Segregation, Racial.Encyclopædia Britannica from Encyclopædia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD .[Accessed November 6, 2007].

Steve Kangas. Timeline of CIA Atrocities. 4 November 2007. http://www.serendipity.li/cia/cia_time.htm

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.The Atomic Bomb Website. October 30, 2007. http://www.vce.com/hironaga.html

The Manhattan Project. The Atomic Bomb – Hiroshima and Nagasaki. National Sovereignty And Collective Security. History 20. http://www.saskschools.ca/curr_content/history20/unit3/sec2_10.html

Vietnam War Casualties. Vietnam War. October 31, 2007. http://www.vietnam-war.info/casualties/

Vietnam War.Com. 31 October 2007. http://www.vietnamwar.com/

William Blum. America: Rogue State. Double Standards. 4 November 2007. http://www.doublestandards.org/usmurder.html

 

 

 

 

 

Read Full Post »


 

Nuclear Israel

 

Dr. Ahmed El-Meadawy

1 September 2006

 

The Holocaust:

 

During the World War II from 1939 to 1945, Nazi Germany under the leadership of Adolf Hitler destroyed some six million European Jews. They were put in large sealed halls, and then exposed to toxic gases. This was the cheapest way to destroy human beings. As the victims were still alive, the Nazi soldiers shaved their heads to use the hair to fill pillows and mattresses for German use. The skins were used for soap production. Nazi scientists conducted scientific experiments on some of the victims, alive. The corpses were, then, burnt in special ovens, and converted into dust to eliminate the massacres’ evidence. The victims’ properties were confiscated by the Nazi State. Not only the Jews, but also, Romany people, Slavs, intellectuals, homosexuals, and political dissidents were exterminated by the Nazi Germans.

 

As the Allies defeated the Nazi Armies, occupied Germany completely, and brought the war to an end, the Nazi plans to entirely destroy the European Jews had failed. The remaining liberated Jews returned to their homes, and found that all their relatives had been murdered, and their properties stolen. They came to the conclusion that Europe could not be a home for them anymore, and decided to immigrate to Palestine and to endure any hurdles to achieve that goal, the creation of a Jewish home land in Palestine. All expected difficulties were considered much easier than what they have already endured. At that time, the Jewish organizations were very active in organizing the immigration of the world Jews illegally to Palestine, which was under British occupation.

 

The Jewish organizations and their allies, mainly in the USA, succeeded in convincing the world powers, especially the American president Harry Truman, to use the United Nations as an instrument to divide Palestine between the native Palestinians and the immigrating Jews. As a result of the pressure the American and many European governments put on smaller countries, a decision was made by the UN on November 29th, 1947, dividing Palestine as the Jewish Organizations wanted.

 

On May 14th, 1948, Ben-Gurion (the founder and first prime-minister), declared the establishment of the state of Israel. The Israelis celebrate that date and call it their independence day, while the Palestinians mourn and call it “the catastrophe day”.

 

Nuclear Israel:

 

The idea of a nuclear Israel was born with the birth of the state of Israel. The Holocaust was the justification for any measure taken by Israel to protect its Jewish population and their new born state.

 

In 1949, Hemed Gimmel led the Israeli search for Uranium in the Negev Desert. In 1952, Ben-Gurion created Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC), and hired Ernst David Bergmann, to chair it. Bergmann, the father of the Israeli Nuclear Bomb, advocated an Israeli bomb as the best way to ensure that “we shall never again be led as lambs to the slaughter.” The IAEC was put under the supervision of Shimon Peres, the Director General of the Ministry of Defense, who had convinced Ben-Gurion to pursue, and was responsible for building Israel’s nuclear capability for some thirty years under complete secrecy.

 

The French Ally:

 

France was the first to help Israel to build the atomic bomb. This co-operation continued during the 50s and 60s of the last century. France was, also, the main arms supplier to Israel during that period.

 

There had been three reasons for the French support to the Israeli Atomic Project. The first one was rewarding Israel for its invasion of Sinai during the 1956 war, as the British and French armies invaded Egypt from the Mediterranean Sea into the Suez Canal. This was to weaken Egypt which was supporting the Algerian Revolution against the French occupation. The invasion was the British answer to the nationalization of Suez Canal by the Egyptian Government. The second reason was, also, rewarding Israel for spying by the Jews in Algeria on behalf of France against the liberation movement, as the Jewish in Algeria were loyal to Israel rather than to Algeria. The third and most important motive was the embargo of certain nuclear enabling computer technology imposed by the USA to prevent France form building its own nuclear bomb according to The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel was able to purchase that technology and heavy water from the USA, and passed them through to France.

 

In 1956, hundreds of French technicians flooded the Negev Desert to construct the top-secret Dimona Nuclear Reactor and a plant for the nuclear bomb production underground to elude the American and Soviet spy satellites. The reactor started to function in 1964. France provided Israel with all its needs of the technology and ingredients needed for the production of the Israeli Nuclear Bomb.

 

The French and Israeli nuclear co-operation included the Israeli involvement in the preproduction design of the early Mirage jet aircraft intended to be capable of delivering nuclear bombs.

 

Promising Israeli students went overseas to study nuclear engineering and physics at the Israeli government expense. Of the Negev Nuclear Research Center’s 2,700 workers, only 150 are allowed to enter the Holy Land’s Machon 2 nuclear bomb factory that consists of 6 floors. Machon 4 is the chief laboratory where the process for extracting the uranium found in the Negev Desert has been perfected, and a new method of producing heavy water had been developed providing Israel with an indigenous capability to produce some of the most important nuclear materials.

 

The British/Norwegian Allies:

 

In 1959 and 1960, Britain sold 20 tons of heavy water to Israel. In the 1950s and 1960s, Britain made hundreds of secret shipments of restricted materials to Israel including Uranium 235 in 1959 and plutonium in 1966. The transactions were made through a Norwegian front company called Noratom which took a 2% commission on the transactions.

 

Israeli Nuclear Arsenal:

 

In 1986, The Sunday Times, published in London (Britain), information provided by Mordechai Vanunu, an Israeli of Moroccan origin and a former employee with the Negev Nuclear Research Center. Experts used that information to estimate the size of the Israeli nuclear arsenal. It is believed that Israel was capable of producing 40 kg of plutonium annually, and atomic bombs with as little as 4 kg of plutonium for each one. That amount of plutonium was enough to produce 10-12 nuclear bombs a year. It is estimated that Israel owns 200-500 atomic bombs with boosted devices, neutron bombs, F-16 deliverable warheads, and Jericho warheads. Experts believe, as well, that Israel’s nuclear arsenal equals each of the British and French arsenals in quantity and quality, but they disagree whether it is the fifth or the sixth nuclear power in the world. The Israeli nuclear arsenal is thought to be of offensive nature and designed to be employed under the Middle East conditions. Israel, also, owns miniaturized thermonuclear bombs designed to maximize deadly gamma radiation while minimizing blast effects and long term radiation, in essence designed to kill people while leaving property intact. This would be useful for Israeli future expansions. Israel might possess 20 hydrogen bombs. A hydrogen bomb is a boosted, 100-1000-times stronger nuclear bomb than a regular one. This bomb produces immense heat and a shock wave that affects an extensive area, and despite this, it produces a smaller amount of fallout and radioactive contamination.

 

Israeli Nuclear Delivery Capabilities:

 

Israel uses short range Jericho I and medium range Jericho II missiles to carry the nuclear heads to their targets. Those missiles are hidden in underground bunkers spread all around Israel. It, also, has American made Harpoon and Cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear heads and hitting targets 1,500 kilometers away.

 

In 1988, Israel began launching several Ofek satellites into orbit atop Shavit (Comet) three-stage rockets, which are derived from the Jericho II missile. The first satellite weighed about 180 kilograms; the most recent, the Ofek 5, about 300 kilograms. The satellites monitor activities in hostile states and provide intelligence. The Shavit could be converted into a long-range ballistic missile, with a range of up to 7,000 kilometers, depending on the weight of the warhead.

 

Israel has modified American-supplied cruise missiles to carry nuclear warheads on submarines, giving the Middle East’s only nuclear power the ability to launch atomic weapons from land, air and beneath the sea. Israel possesses hundreds of nuclear artillery shells, land mines, and low radiating neutron bombs.

 

In addition, Israel possesses American jets capable of carrying and delivering the nuclear heads including F-4 Phantom, F-15E, F-16, and A-4 Skyhawks. The F-16 has been the backbone of the Israeli Air Force and is the most likely candidate for air delivery of nuclear weapons. From 1980 to 1995, Israel bought or received 260 F-16s from the United States: 103 F-16As, 22 F-16Bs, 81 F-16Cs, and 54 F-16Ds. In 1999, the Israeli government announced it would buy 50 F-16Is, at a cost of about $2.5 billion. Israel will receive the aircrafts over a two-year period beginning in early 2003. Under this contract, Israel has the option to purchase 60 additional aircraft. If it does, delivery would continue through 2008.

 

The American Ally:

 

The United States first became aware of Dimona’s existence after U-2 overflights in 1958 captured the facility’s construction, but it was not identified as a nuclear site until two years later. The complex was variously explained as a textile plant, an agricultural station, and a metallurgical research facility, until David Ben-Gurion stated in December 1960 that Dimona complex was a nuclear research center built for “peaceful purposes.” As early as 8 December 1960, the CIA issued a report outlining Dimona’s implications for nuclear proliferation, and the CIA station in Tel Aviv had determined by the mid-1960s that the Israeli nuclear weapons program was an established and irreversible fact.

 

Richard Nixon and his chief foreign policy adviser Henry Kissinger privately endorsed Israel’s program and reached a secret understanding with the Israelis in 1969 that allowed them to pursue their nuclear program as long as they maintained a policy of deliberate ambiguity. Nixon in a meeting with the former Labor Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir pressed Israel to “make no visible introduction of nuclear weapons or undertake a nuclear test program”. His administration went to great lengths to keep nuclear issues out of any talks on the Middle East. Information on Israeli nuclear capabilities was routinely suppressed. The United States even supplied Israel with krytrons (nuclear triggers) and supercomputers that were bound for the Israeli nuclear program.

 

Top officials in the Reagan administration made a conscious effort to keep information on Israel’s nuclear capability from State Department officials and others who might have had concerns over nuclear proliferation issues.

 

The senior Bush administration sold at least 1,500 nuclear “dual-use” items to Israel, according to a report by the General Accounting Office, despite requirements under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that the existing nuclear powers like the United States not help another country’s nuclear weapons program “in any way.”

 

The Israeli media reported that President Clinton wrote the rightist Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu in 1998 pledging that the United States would continue to protect Israel’s nuclear program from international pressure. According to Haaretz, “the United States will preserve Israel’s strategic deterrence capabilities and ensure that Middle East arms control initiatives will not damage it in the future. The Clinton letter provided written – if secret – backup to the long-standing agreement between Jerusalem and Washington over the preservation of Israel’s nuclear capabilities, if Israel maintains its policy of ‘ambiguity’ and does not announce publicly that it has the bomb.”

 

Meanwhile, Congress has for many years made it clear to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and other responsible parties that it did not want to have anything revealed in an open hearing related to Israel’s nuclear capability. A major reason is that there are a number of laws that severely restrict US military and technical assistance to countries that develop nuclear weapons. Israel is the largest recipient of US arms exports, which are highly profitable for the politically influential arms industry.

 

In addition, given the enormous costs of any nuclear program of such magnitude, it would have been very difficult for Israel to develop such a large and advanced arsenal without the tens of billions of dollars in unrestricted American financial support. More than simply employing a double standard of threatening perceived enemies for developing nuclear weapons while tolerating development of such weapons by its allies, the United States has, in effect, subsidized nuclear proliferation in the Middle East.

 

What both Republican and Democratic leaders have failed to observe, however, is that Israel remains in violation of UN Security Council resolution 487, which calls on Israel to place its facilities at Dimona under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) trusteeship. Despite bipartisan efforts in Congress to seek repeal of that resolution, it is still legally binding. Bush and Kerry, however, believe that UN Security Council resolutions, like nuclear nonproliferation, do not apply to US allies.

 

Furthermore, while one could make a case for an Israeli nuclear deterrent up through the mid-1970s, Israel’s qualitative advantage in conventional forces relative to any combination of Arab states developed subsequently – resulting in large part from a phenomenal amount of taxpayer-funded arms transfers from the United States – would appear to weaken the case for a nuclear weapons development. Furthermore, Israel has an extensive biological and chemical weapons program that far surpasses those of any potential hostile powers and – combined with vastly superior delivery systems – would constitute a more-than-adequate deterrent

 

Like Israel, the United States has acknowledged its willingness to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear adversaries.

 

The German Nuclear Submarines:

 

At the end of the 1990s, the Jewish state, with a coastline of 270 kilometers, acquired three German-built diesel-powered Dolphin-class submarines equipped with American-made Harpoon missiles modified to carry small nuclear warheads. The submarines were produced by the German companies Thyssen Nordseewerke in Emden and Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft in Kiel. Israel has succeeded in modifying U.S.-made Cruise missiles, capable of carrying nuclear warheads, to be launched from those submarines. With its three submarines, Israel could deploy one nuclear-armed submarine at sea at all times. The most invulnerable types of nuclear-armed sea-based systems traditionally have been submarines. The first submarine, the Dolphin, arrived in Haifa on July 27, 1999. The Leviathan joined the fleet before the end of 1999, and the third boat, the Tekumah, was delivered in July 2000. The cost of each submarine is estimated at $300 million.

 

Israeli Nuclear Readiness:

 

It is believed that Israel was able in 1966 to produce enough plutonium that allowed the assembly of 2 atomic bombs before the 1967 6-days war, during which Israel declared its first nuclear alert. The two bombs were available for use in case of an Israeli defeat.

 

The second Israeli nuclear alert was during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. It is reported that, fearing defeat, the Israelis assembled 13 twenty-kiloton atomic bombs, deployed, and considered using them. The Arabs may have limited their war aims because of their knowledge of the Israeli nuclear weapons. During that war, Israel used nuclear blackmail to force Kissinger and Nixon to airlift massive amounts of military hardware to Israel.

 

Israel entered the third nuclear alert during the Golf War started on January 18th, 1991 for the 43 days of the war, during which Saddam Hussein launched 40 Scud Missiles in 17 attacks at Israel, none of which caused any significant damage.

 

Israeli Nuclear Strategy:

 

The Israeli government refuses to officially confirm or deny that it has a nuclear weapon program, and has an unofficial but rigidly enforced policy of deliberate ambiguity supported by the United States. Both countries consider Israel a non nuclear state, when preventing other Middle East, Arab or Moslem nations from developing nuclear weapons. On the other hand, the nuclear Israeli threat is used to impose Israeli terms on those countries.

 

It is believed that Israel possesses all kinds known of weapons of mass destruction, chemical, biological, and nuclear. This is a foundation on which the Israeli grand strategy rests to protect its expansion policy and to force the neighboring Arab states to sign peace agreements without the return of all occupied territories. It is also used to protect the so called Arabic moderate regimes against internal instabilities. Munya Mardoch, Director of the Israeli Institute for the Development of Weaponry, said in 1994, “The moral and political meaning of nuclear weapons is that states which renounce their use are acquiescing to the status of Vassal states. All those states which feel satisfied with possessing conventional weapons alone are fated to become vassal states.

 

To enable Israel to abstain from dependence on nuclear arms, the United States has been providing Israel with $2 to 3 billion per year in U.S. aid. Since then Israel’s nuclear arsenal has expanded exponentially, both quantitatively and qualitatively, while the U.S. money spigots remain wide open.

 

The superior Israeli arsenal of weapons of mass destruction confines its interest in peace in the Middle East to only one option of dictating its own terms. Shimon Peres, former Israeli prime minister, leader of the Israeli Labor Party, Ben-Gurion’s aid, and responsible for the development of the Israeli nuclear arsenal for some 30 years, said that the Israeli nuclear power was the reason for Anwar Sadaat, former Egyptian president, to visit Jerusalem searching for peace. This comment implies that the Arab nations have no choice but to resign to the overwhelming Israeli nuclear force.

 

Israel intends to destroy any Arab or Moslem nuclear project, as it had bombed the Iraqi nuclear reactor in Osirak on 7 June 1981. In 1983, the former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon proposed to India that it join with Israel to attack Pakistani nuclear facilities.

 

Within Israel, however, there was much debate among Israeli elites regarding the wisdom of developing nuclear weapons. Some Israeli leaders – ranging from former Labor Prime Ministers Golda Meir and Yigal Allon to former Likud Defense Minister Raful Eitan – argued that a nuclear Israel would increase the possibility of Arab states developing weapons of mass destruction and launching a first strike against Israel. Given the country’s small size, Israel might not have a credible second-strike capability. There is also the fact that most of Israel’s potential nuclear targets are close enough so that a shift in wind could potentially send a radioactive cloud over Israel.

 

References:

 

“Before Meeting with King, Peres Claims Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal was built for Peace,” Jordan Times, July 14, 1998.

“Former Official Says France Helped Build Israel’s Dimona Complex.” Nucleonics Week October 16, 1986, 6.

“How Israel Got the Bomb.” Time, 12 April 1976, 39.

Israel crosses the threshold“, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2006, pp. 22-30.

Israel says El Al crash chemical ‘non-toxic’“, BBC, 1998-10-2. Retrieved on 200607-02.

“Israel: The Covert Connection.” Frontline, PBS Network, May 16, 1989, quoted in Spector, Leonard S., and McDonough, Mark G., with Medeiros, Evan S., Tracking Nuclear Proliferation. A Guide in Maps and Charts, 1995 (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1995).

Mordechai Vanunu: The Sunday Times articles“, The Times, 200404-21

“Nuclear proliferation didn’t start in 1998 . . .and not in Pakistan nor with Islam,” Middle East Realities (http://www.middleeast.org/1998_06_28.htm.)

“Revealed: The Secrets of Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal” (London) Sunday Times No. 8,461, 5 October 1986, 1, 4-5.

“Russian Foreign Intelligence Service, Report on the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, Moscow, 1993.” Journal of Palestine Studies XXII, no. 4 (Summer 1993): 135-140; Creveld, Martin van, Nuclear Proliferation and the Future Of Conflict (New York: The Free Press, 1993), 105; and Clark, Philip. “ôThird successful Israeli satellite launch.” Jane’s Intelligence Review 7, no. 6 (June 1995), 25-26.

“Was there a Nuclear Test near Eilat?” Israel Wire, 16 June 1998 (http://www.israelwire.com; http://www.israelwire.com/New/980618/9806184.html).

“Israel & the US: From Dependence to Nuclear Weapons?” Robert W. Tucker, November 1975 pp41-42

Abecasis, Rachel, “Uranium reportedly offered to China, Israel.” Radio Renascenca, Lisbon, 9 December 1992 quoted in Center for Nonproliferation, “Proliferation Issues,” 23 December, 1992, 25 (http://cns.miis.edu)

Ahmar, Moonis, “Pakistan and Israel: Distant Adversaries or Neighbors?” Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, 1996, 20, no.1, 43-44.

Albright, Berkhout, and Walker, op. cit., 262-263.

Albright, David, Berkhout, Frans and Walker, William, Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium 1996. World Inventories, Capabilities, and Policies (New York: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute And Oxford University Press, 1997), 262-263.

Amos, Deborah, Lines in the Sand: Desert Storm and the Remaking of the Arab World (New York, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1992), 105.

Aronson and Brosh, op. cit., 276.

Aronson, Geoffrey, “Hidden Agenda: US-Israeli Relations and the Nuclear Question,” Middle East Journal, 46, no. 4 (Autumn 1992), 619-630.

Aronson, Shlomo, Israel’s Nuclear Options, ACIS Working Paper No. 7. Los Angeles, California: University of California Center for Arms Control and International Security, 1977, 3, and Sorenson, David S., “Middle East Regional Studies-AY99,” Air War College: Maxwell Air Force Base, AL, 542.

Aronson, Slomo and Brosh, Oded, The Politics and Strategy of Nuclear Weapons in the Middle East, the Opacity Theory, and Reality, 1960-1991-An Israeli Perspective (Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 1992), 20.

Atomic Activities in Israel (PDF). UK Cabinet Submission from Joint Intelligence Bureau. Cabinet Office, Government of the United Kingdom (196107-17).

Background Information, 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. United Nations.

Barbara Rogers & Zdenek Cervenka, The Nuclear Axis: The Secret Collaboration Between West Germany and South Africa, New York, 1978, Times Books, p. 325-328 (the definitive history of the Apartheid Bomb)

Barnaby, Frank, “Capping Israel’s Nuclear Volcano,” Between War and Peace. Dilemmas of Israeli Security, edited by Efraim Karsh (London, England: Frank Cass, 1996), 98.

Barnaby, Frank, The Invisible Bomb: The Nuclear Arms Race in the Middle East (London: I. B. Tauris, 1988), 25.

Bennett, Jeremy, The Suez Crisis. BBC Video. n.d. Videocassette and Raviv, Dan and Melman, Yossi. Every Spy a Prince. The Complete History of Israel’s Intelligence Community. (Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1990), 63-69.

Beres, Louis Rene, “Israel’s Bomb in the Basement: A revisiting of `Deliberate Ambiguity’ vs. `Disclosure’, Between War and Peace: Dilemmas of Israeli Security, edited by Efraim Harsh (London, England: Frank Cass, 1996), 113-133.

Beres, Louis Rene, “Israel’s bomb in the basement: A revisiting of `Deliberate Ambiguity’ vs. `Disclosure.’ ” In Karsh, Efraim, op. cit., Editor, Between War and Peace: Dilemmas of Israeli Security (London, England: Frank Cass, 1996), 116.

Bibliography of Israeli Nuclear Science Publications by Mark Gorwitz, June 2005

Black, Ian and Morris, Benny, Israel’s Secret Wars. A history of Israel’s Intelligence Services (New York, New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1991), 418-419.

Blanche, Ed, “Is the Myth Fading for the Israeli Army? ” Part 1.” Jane’s Intelligence Review, 8, no. 12 (December 1996), 547-550 and Blanche, Ed. “Is the myth fading for the Israeli Army? ” Part 2,” Jane’s Intelligence Review 9, no. 1 (January 1997), 25-28.

Blast, from the past to the present By Yirmiyahu Yovel Ha’aretz. 28 July 2000

BOB FELDMAN, http://www.counterpunch.org/feldman1014.html

Boyne, Sean, “Across the Great Divide. Will Assad go for the Golan?” Jane’s Intelligence Review, 10, no. 4 (April 1998), 21-24 and Cordesman, 1996, op. cit., 254.

Brecher, Michael, Decision in Crisis. Israel, 1967 and 1973 (Berkley, California: University of California Press, 1980), 104, 230-231.

Brower, Kenneth S., “A Propensity for Conflict: Potential Scenarios and Outcomes of War in the Middle East,” Jane’s Intelligence Review, Special Report no. 14, (February 1997), 14-15.

Broyde, Michael J., “Fighting the War and the Peace: Battlefield Ethics, Peace Talks, Treaties, and Pacifism in the Jewish Tradition (http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/war3.html

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists

Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 278.

Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 280 and Cohen, Israel and the Bomb, op. cit., 273-274.

Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 280.

Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 283-284.

Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 297n and Creveld, 1998, op. cit., 321-322.

Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 302.

Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 308.

Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 464-465 and Raviv, Dan and Melman, Yossi, op. cit., 1990, 304-305.

Burrows, and Windrem, op. cit., 311-312 and “Israel begins test of nuclear missile submarines,” The Irish Times, July 2, 1998 (http://www.irish-times.com/irish-times/paper/1998/0702/wor13.html.

Burrows, William E. and Windrem, Robert, Critical Mass. The Dangerous Race for Superweapons in a Fragmenting World (New York, New York: Simon (http://www.antiwar.com/orig/zunes.php?articleid=2378)

Center for Nonproliferation Studies. “Israeli Friends,” ISIS Report, May 1994 (http://cns.miis.edu)

Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG), globalresearch.ca, 3 March 2002

Cherkashin, Nikolai, “On Moscow’s Orders.” Russian Life, 39, no. 10 (October 1996), Brownlow, Cecil. “Soviets poise three-front global drive. Nuclear weapons in Egypt, artillery buildup at Guantanamo, Communist concentrations in Vietnam aimed at political gains.” Aviation Week and Space Technology 99, no. 19 (5 November 1973), 12-14; Holt, Robert. “Soviet Power Play.” Aviation Week and Space Technology 99, no. 19 (5 November 1973), 7 and Gur-Arieh, Danny, “A non-Conventional Look at Israel During ’73 War.” IsraelWire Tuesday, October 6, 1998 17, 23 (http://www.israelwire.com/new/981006/9810068.html

Chirkin, Dmitri, “Last KGB Spy to be Released in Israel“, Pravda, 2003-01-15

Chubin, Shahram, “Does Iran Want Nuclear Weapons?” Survival 37, no. 1 (Spring 1995), 91-93.

Cohen and Miller, op. cit., 18.

Cohen, Avner and Miller, Marvin, Nuclear Shadows in the Middle East: Prospects for Arms Control in the Wake of the Gulf Crisis (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990), 10.

Cohen, Avner, “Israel’s Nuclear History: The Untold Kennedy-Eshkol Dimona Correspondence.” Journal of Israeli History, 1995 16, no. 2, 159-194 and Cohen, Avner, Comp. “Recently Declassified 1963 Correspondence between President Kennedy and Prime Ministers Ben-Gurion and Eshkol.” Journal of Israeli History, 1995 16, no. 2, 195-207 (www.seas.gwu.edu/nsarchive/israel

Cohen, Avner, “Most Favored Nation.” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 51, no. 1 (January-February 1995): 44-53.

Cohen, Avner, Israel and the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998), 16.

Cohen, Avner. “Cairo, Dimona, and the June 1967 War.” Middle East Journal 50, no. 2 (Spring 1996), 190-210.

Cohen, Eliezer. Israel’s best defense: the First Full Story of the Israeli Air Force, (New York, New York: Random House, 1993), 495.

Cohen, Israel and the Bomb, 48-49.

Cohen, Israel and the Bomb, 57-59.

Cohen, Israel and the Bomb, op. cit., 210-213.

Cohen, Israel and the Bomb, op. cit., 231-232 and 256-257.

Cohen, op. cit., Israel and the Bomb, 237.

Cohen, op. cit., Israel and the Bomb, 82-83.

Cohen, Stuart A., The Scroll or the Sword? Dilemmas of Religion and Military Service in Israel (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997), 11-24.

Cordesman, 1991, 120.

Cordesman, 1991, 127.

Cordesman, Anthony, Perilous Prospects: The Peace Process and the Arab-Israeli Military Balance (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1996), 118.

Cordesman, op. cit., 1996, 234.

Cordesman, op. cit., 1996, 243.

Cordesman, op. cit., 1996, 265.

Creveld, 1998, op. cit., 220-221.

Creveld, Martin van. The Sword and the Olive. A Critical History of the Israeli Defense Force (New York, New York: Public Affairs, 1998), 174.

Creveld, op. cit., 1993, 105.

Creveld, op. cit., 1998, 252.

Creveld, op. cit., 1998, 298.

Data from CIA, quoted in Weissman and Krosney, op. cit., 109.

Data from NBC Nightly News, quoted in Milhollin, op. cit., 104 and Burrows and Windrem, op. cit., 308.

Data from Time, 12 April 1976, quoted in Weissman and Krosney, op. cit., 107.

Data from Vanunu quoted in Milhollin, op. cit., 104.

Davis, Douglas, “Defense Officials Said Urging Nuclear Second-Strike Capability,” Jerusalem Post, 6 August 1998, 3 (http://cns.miis.edu)

Dawoud, Khaled, “Redefining the bomb“, Al-Ahram Weekly, 199912-02

DEBKAfile, February 23, 2001 http://www.debka.com

Discussions with the Israelis on nuclear matters (PDF). Memorandum for the President. National Security Archive (196910-07).

Dolphin Class Submarines. Uri Dotan-Bochner.

Dowdy, op. cit., 20.

Dowler, Thomas W. and Howard II, Joseph H., “Countering the threat of the well-armed tyrant: A modest proposal for small nuclear weapons,” Strategic Review, XIX, no. 4 (Fall 1991), 34-40.

Dowty, Alan. “Israel and Nuclear Weapons.” Midstream 22, no. 7 (November 1976), 8-9.

Dowty, op. cit., 8.

Evron, Yair, Israel’s Nuclear Dilemma (Ithaca, New York: Cornell Publishing, 1994), 62-Cohen, Avner, “Peres: Peacemaker, Nuclear Pioneer.” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 52, no. 3 (May/June 1996), 16-17 and Aronson, S, op. cit., 11-12.

Federation of American Scientists, “Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Program.” 10 December 1997 (http://www.fas.org/nuke/hew/Israel/Isrhist.html)

Fighting to preserve the tattered veil of secrecy By Ronen Bergman The publication of Dr. Avner Cohen’s book and of the Vanunu trial transcripts set off alarm bells for the Defense Ministry’s chief of security, who is striving to protect the traditional opacity regarding Israel’s nuclear affairs.

Frantz, Douglas, “Israel Adds Fuel to Nuclear Dispute“, Los Angeles Times, 2003-12-10.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction

Gaffney, Mark, Dimona: The Third Temple? The Story Behind the Vanunu Revelation (Brattleboro, Vermont: Amana Books, 1989), 100-101.

Gaffney, op. cit. 1989. p. 147

Gaffney, op. cit., 165.

Gaffney, op. cit., 1989, p. 34

Gaffney, op. cit., p194

Gaffney, op.cit., 1989, p 131

Gaffney, op.cit., 1989, p. 163

Gaffney, op.cit., 1989, pps. 65-66 (An alternative discussion of the NUMEC affair)

Gaffney, op.cit., p. 63

Garrity, op. cit., 92-111.

Garrity, Patrick J. “The Next Nuclear Questions.” Parameters, XXV, no. 4 (Winter 1995-96), 92-111.

Gillette, Robert, “Uranium Enrichment: Rumors of Israeli Progress with Lasers.” Science 183, no. 4130 (22 March 1974), 1172-1174.

Green, Living by the Sword, op. cit., 134.

Green, op. cit., Living by the Sword, 90-99.

Green, Stephen, Living by the Sword: America and Israel in the Middle East, 1968-1987 (London: Faber, 1988), 63-80.

Green, Stephen, Taking Sides. America’s Secret Relations with a Militant Israel (New York: William Morrow and Company, 1984), 152.

Green, Taking Sides, 148-179 and Raviv, Dan and Melman, Yossi, 1990, 197-198.

Harden, Major James D., Israeli Nuclear Weapons and War in the Middle East, Master’s Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, December 1997.

Harel, Amos and Barzilai, Amnon, “Mordechai says Arrow alone cannot protect against missiles,” Ha’aretz, 13 January 1999 (http://www3.haaretz.co.il/eng/htmls/3_9.htm).

Harkavy, Robert E. “After the Gulf War: The Future of the Israeli Nuclear Strategy,” The Washington Quarterly (Summer 1991), 164.

Hersch, op.cit., p. 131

Hersh, 1989. pp.199-200

Hersh, 257.

Hersh, op. cit., 126-128.

Hersh, op. cit., 139.

Hersh, op. cit., 1989, p. 213

Hersh, op. cit., 216, 276 and Kaku, Michio. “Contingency Plans: Nuclear Weapons after the Cold War.” In Altered States: A Reader in the New World Order, Bennis, Phyllis and Moushabeck, Michel, Eds. (New York, New York: 1993), 66.

Hersh, op. cit., 216.

Hersh, op. cit., 217, 222-226, and Weissman and Krosney, op. cit., 107.

Hersh, op. cit., 230-231.

Hersh, op. cit., 271-275.

Hersh, op. cit., 291.

Hersh, op. cit., 319.

Hersh, op. cit., 321-235.

Hersh, op. cit., p. 19

Hersh, op. cit., pp. 285-305

Hersh, op.cit., 1991, p. 319

Hersh, op.cit., p. 319

Hersh, op.cit., pp. 242-257

Hersh, Seymour M., The Samson Option. Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (New York: Random House, 1991), 223.

Hersh, The Samson Option, 196.

Hough, Harold, “Could Israel’s Nuclear Assets Survive a First Strike?” Jane’s Intelligence Review, September 1997, 407-410.

Hough, Harold, “Israel reviews its nuclear deterrent,” Jane’s Intelligence Review 10, no.11 (November 1998), 11-13.

Hough, Harold, “Israel’s Nuclear Infrastructure,” Jane’s Intelligence Review 6, no. 11 (November 1994), 508.

Hough, Harold, op. cit., 1998, 11-12 and Berger, Julian, “Court Fury At Israeli Reactor.” Guardian, 13 October 1997, in Center for Nonproliferation, “Nuclear Abstracts,” 13 October 1997, or on-line, Internet, 22 November 1998 (http://cns.miis.edu)

Hounman, op. cit. 1999, pp 189-203

http://infomanage.com/nonproliferation/najournal/israelinucs.html.

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/cpc-pubs/farr.htm

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/farr.htm

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/STE203A.html

http://www.rense.com/general35/isrnuk.htm

http://www.rense.com/general35/isrnuk.htm

http://www.rense.com/general67/UJK.HTM

http://www.rense.com/general71/nuce.htm

http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=so02norris

ibid, p. 149

ibid, p. 153

ibid, p. 153

ibid, p. 312

ibid, p.198-200

ibid, p.2

ibid, p.43

ibid, pp 39-40

ibid, pp. 3-17

ibid, pp. 37-38

Ibid., 111.

Ibid., 230, 243.

Ibid., 234.

Ibid., 234-235 and Aronson, S, op. cit., 15-18.

Ibid., 262-263.

Ibid., 273-274.

Ibid., 37-38 and Friedman, Robert I. Zealots for Zion: Inside Israel’s West Bank Settlement Movement (New York, New York: Random House, 1992), 132-52.

Inbar, Efraim, “Israel’s security in a new international environment,” in Karsh, Efraim, Editor, Between War and Peace: Dilemmas of Israeli Security (London, England: Frank Cass, 1996), 41.

Israel and Nuclear Weapons How many nukes does Israel have — or need?, http://www.peaceheroes.com/MordecaiVanunu/israelnuclearweapons.htm

Israel and the Bomb Avner Cohen has provides a detailed account of of the political aspects of Israel’s nuclear history that draws on thousands of American and Israeli government documents-most of them recently declassified and never before cited-and more than one hundred interviews with key individuals who played important roles in this story.

Israel and the Bomb: Principal players. National Security Archive.

Israel Shahak, Open Secrets: Israeli Nuclear and Foreign Policies, London, 1997, Pluto Press, p. 40

Israel The Nuclear Potential of Individual Countries Treaty on Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons Problems of Extension Appendix 2 Russian Federation Foreign Intelligence Service 6 April 1995

Israel: Plutonium Production The Risk Report Volume 2 Number 4 (July-August 1996).

Israel: Uranium Processing and Enrichment The Risk Report Volume 2 Number 4 (July-August 1996).

Israeli nuclear forces, 2002

Israeli Weapons of Mass Destruction: a Threat to Peace

John Pike and Federation of American Scientists, Israel Special Weapons Guide Website, 2001 (http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/index.html).

Jones, Meirion, “Britain’s dirty secret“, New Statesman, 200603-13. Retrieved on 200607-02.

Kaku, op. cit., 66 and Hersh, op. cit., 216.

Karsh, Efraim, Between War and Peace: Dilemmas of Israeli Security (London, England: Frank Cass, 1996), 82.

Karsh, op. cit., 86.

Karsh, op. cit., 9.

Levran, Aharon, Israeli Strategy after Desert Storm: Lessons from the Second Gulf War (London: Frank Cass, 1997), 1-10.

Levran, op. cit., 8-10.

Loftus and Aarons, op. cit., 316-317.

Loftus, John and Aarons, Mark, The Secret War Against the Jews. How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People (New York, New York: St. Martin’s Griffin, 1994), 287-303.

London Sunday Times, October 12, 1986

Mark Gaffney, Dimona, The Third Temple:The Story Behind the Vanunu Revelation, Brattleboro, VT, 1989, Amana Books, p. 165 (Excellent progressive analysis of the Israeli nuclear program)

Maxwell AFB AL 36112-6427k

McKinnon, Dan. Bullseye One Reactor. The Story of Israel’s Bold Surprise Air Attack That Destroyed Iraqi’s Nuclear Bomb Facility (Shrewsbury, England: Airlife Publishing Ltd., 1987).

Melman, Yossi, “Swimming with the Dolphins,” Ha’aretz, Tuesday, June 9, 1998, and “Report: Israel to get Subs with Nuclear Strike Capability,” Jerusalem Post, I July 3, 1998, 3 and Sorenson, op. cit., 543.

Milhollin, 100-119.

Milhollin, Gary, “Heavy Water Cheaters.” Foreign Policy (1987-88): 101-102.

Milhollin, op. cit., 103-104.

Nashif, op. cit., 32.

Nashif, Taysir N., Nuclear Weapons in Israel (New Delhi: S. B. Nangia Books, 1996), 3.

Nashif, Taysir N., Nuclear Weapons in the Middle East: Dimensions and Responsibilities (Princeton, New Jersey: Kingston Press, 1984), 22-23.

New Ziyyona. globalsecurity.org. Retrieved on 200607-02.

Nordeen, Lon O., Nicolle, David, Phoenix over the Nile (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institute Press, 1996), 192-193.

NRDC: Nuclear Notebook

Nuclear weapons – Israel. Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved on 200607-02.

O’Balance, Edgar, No Victor, No Vanquished. The Yom Kippur War (San Rafael, California: Presido Press, 1978), 175.

O’Balance, Edgar, The Third Arab-Israeli War (London: Faber and Faber, 1972), 54.

Obsessive secrecy undermines democracy By Reuven Pedatzur Ha’aretz. Tuesday, August 8, 2000

O’Sullivan, Arich, “New F-15I Warplanes Expand Israel’s Reach,” The Jerusalem Post, 19 January 1997 (http://www.jpost.co.il).

Ottenberg, Michael, “Estimating Israel’s Nuclear Capabilities,” Command, 30 (October 1994), 6-8.

Pedatzur, Re’uven, “South African Statement On Nuclear Test Said to Serve Israel,” Ha’aretz, 29 July 1997. On line: Internet, 22 November 1998 and Kelley, Robert. “The Iraqi and South African Nuclear W”ôNuclear Abstracts,” 1 March 1996 (http://cns.miis.edu).

Peres admits to Israeli nuclear capability. Federation of American Scientists (199807-14).

Peres, Shimon, Battling for Peace. A Memoir (New York, New York: Random House, Pry, 10.

Peter Hounam, Woman From Mossad: The Torment of Mordechai Vanunu, London, 1999, Vision Paperbacks, pp. 155-168

Popeye Turbo. globalsecurity.org. Retrieved on 200607-02.

Pry, op. cit., 75.

Pry, Peter, Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal (Boulder, Colorado: Westview, 1984), 5-6.

Raviv and Melman, op. cit., 399.

Raviv, Dan and Melman, Yossi, 1990, 58.

Raviv, Dan and Melman, Yossi, Friend in Deed: Inside the U.S.-Israel Alliance (New York New York: Hyperion, 1994), 299.

Raviv, Dan and Melman, Yossi, op. cit., 1990, 344-345, 422-423.

Seymour Hersh, The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy, New York,1991, Random House, p.

Shahak, Israel, Open Secrets: Israeli Nuclear and Foreign Policies (London: Pluto Press, 1997), 72-73.

Shahak, op. cit., 4-5.

Shahak, op. cit., 78-79.

Shahak, op. cit., p150

Shahak, op. cit., p34

Smith, Gerard C. and Cobban, Helena. “A Blind Eye To Nuclear Proliferation.” Foreign Affairs 68, no. 3(1989), 53-70.

Spector, Leonard S., “Foreign-Supplied Combat Aircraft: Will They Drop the Third World Bomb?” Journal of International Affairs 40, no. 1(1986): 145 (n. 5) and Green, Living by the Sword, op. cit., 18-19.

Spector, Leonard S., The Undeclared Bomb (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishers, 1988), 387 (n.22).

Spector, The Undeclared Bomb, 395(n. 57).98-199

Spector, The Undeclared Bomb, op. cit., 165-166.

Spector, The Undeclared Bomb, op. cit., 179.

Spector, The Undeclared Bomb, op. cit., 396 (n. 62); Garthoff, Raymond L., Détente and Confrontation: American-Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, 1994), 426, n76 and Bandmann, Yona and Cordova, Yishai. “The Soviet Nuclear Threat Towards the Close of the Yom Kippur War.” Jerusalem Journal of International Relations 1980 5, no. 1, 107-9.

Stanghelle, Harold, “Israel to sell back 10.5 tons.” Arbeiderbladet, Oslo, Norway, 28 June 1990 in: Center for Nonproliferation Studies, “Nuclear Developments,” 28 June 1990, 34-35; on-line, Internet 22 November 1998 (http://cns.miis.edu).

Statement from the Foreign Office. Newsnight. BBC (200603-09

Stopping the introduction of nuclear weapons into the middle east (PDF). Memorandum to the secretary of state. National Security Archive (196903-17

Sunday Times, London, op. cit., 1,4-5.

Tahtinen, Dale R., The Arab-Israel Military Balance Today (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1973), 34.

Terrill, W. Andrew, “The Chemical Warfare Legacy of the Yemen War.” Comparative Strategy, 10 (1991), 109-119.

The Bomb That Never Is by Avner Cohen, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2000, Vol 56, No. 3 pp.22-23

The Release of Mordechai Vanunu and US Role in Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal

The Samson Option. Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy Seymour M Hersh, [New York: Random House, 1991]

The Third Temple’s Holy Of Holies: Israel’s Nuclear Weapons Warner D. Farr, LTC, U.S. Army, September 1999

The Third Temple’s holy of holies: Israel’s nuclear weapons. The Counterproliferation Papers, Future Warfare Series No. 2. USAF Counterproliferation Center, Air War College, Air University, Maxwell Air Force Base (September 1999).

Toscano, Louis, Triple Cross: Israel, the Atomic Bomb and the Man Who Spilled the Secrets (New York: Carol Publishing Group, 1990).

U.S. Army Lt. Col. Warner D. Farr, The Third Temple Holy of Holies; Israel’s Nuclear Weapons, USAF Counterproliferation Center, Air War College Sept 1999 (www.fas.org/nuke/guide/israel/nuke/farr,htm)

Usi Mahnaimi and Marie Colvin, Israel Planning “Ethnic” bomb as Saddam Caves In, November 15, 1998, London Sunday Times

Usi Mahnaimi and Peter Conradi, Fears of New Arms Race as Israel Tests Cruise Missiles, June 18, 2000, London Sunday Times

Usi Mahnaimi, Israeli Jets Equipped for Chemical Warfare October 4, 1998, London Sunday Times

Uzi Mahnaimi and Tom Walker, London Sunday Times, February 25, 2001

Valéry, op. cit., 807-09.

Valry, Nicholas, “Israel’s Silent Gamble with the Bomb,” New Scientist (12 December 1974), 807-09.

Weissman and Krosney, 112.

Weissman and Krosney, 119-124.

Weissman and Krosney, 124-128 and Raviv, Dan and Melman, Yossi, 1990, 198-199.

Weissman and Krosney, op. cit., 109.

Weissman and Krosney, op. cit.,114-117

 

Read Full Post »


The Zionist Alliance

Dr. Ahmed El-Meadawy

20 August 2006

Ideology:

Zionism is an ideology and a project that mean the Jews outside Israel live in exile and have to return to their eternal homeland Israel, whose establishment was declared by its founder and first prime-minister Ben-Gurion on 14 May 1948. The Zionist plan is to include all the land between the rivers Nile (west), Euphrates (east), and Litany (north) and Sharm Al Sheik (south), which are optimum natural borders as Ben-Gurion thought. Israel borders are supposed to be flexible to allow its expansion as more Jews arrive from all parts of the world to be able to include them. Zionism has advocated that “Palestine is a land without people, and the Jews are people without a land”. Accepting borders less than those has been a temporary tactic to achieve international recognition; and to deceive the involved Arab victims, until Israel’s power increases, its opponents become weaker, and suitable military and political international conditions are developed for the gradual and final expansion to the planed borders.

Zionism has been based on using overwhelming force to suppress the Palestinian Arabs and any allied Arab forces resisting its plans, and allying itself with the colonial powers at different times. Theodor Herzl, the founder of the World Zionist Organization in 1897, wrote in the Jewish State (1886) trying to convince the imperial powers of his time that the Jewish community could serve as: “part of a wall of defense for Europe in Asia, an outpost of civilization against barbarism (Arabs).”

Zionism has always depended on the support of one of the great colonial powers to achieve international legitimacy and military protection. Great Brittan played that role in the 20s and 30s of the past century, then, was replaced by the USA. Zionism provided the British armies with 18,800 Jewish volunteers during the World War II, which led to the establishment of a professional regular Zionist army and British gratitude. Afterwards, Israel, the Zionist state, played the role of the chief American ally in the Middle East, especially after the fall of the American collaborator Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Shah of Iran on 16 January 1979.

The Palestinians have been murdered, assassinated, imprisoned, tortured, kidnapped, made homeless, economically strangled, and had all their lives destroyed by Israel to abandon the remaining of their land and to be replaced by new Jewish immigrants from all parts of the world. A survey of December 31st, 1922 had shown a Jewish population in Palestine of 83,794 (11%) versus 757,182 Arab Palestinians. Zionism has increased the Jews inhabitants of Palestine 75 times to 6.3 million currently.

Chaim Weizmann, the first Israeli president (1949-1952), compared the Palestinian Arabs to the rocks of Judea, obstacles that had to be cleared to make the path smooth. The optimum way for removing them was their voluntary or forced migration to the neighboring Arab countries. The following wars of 1948 and 1967 have lead to the fulfillment of Weizmann’s vision, as 800,000 Palestinians have been turned into refugees.

Christian Zionism:

It was founded among England’s Protestants based on the Bible written by Cyrus Scofield in 1909. Then, it spread to the USA. The Christian Zionists believe and support the Zionist prophecy that the creation Israel is a realization of an eternal irreversible bond between God and Abraham, according to which the land between the rivers Nile and Euphrates belongs to the Jews eternally. The Jewish Temple will be rebuilt on Al Aqssa Mosque’s current location after destroying it and the eviction of the aboriginal Palestinian population. The use of any means to achieve the Zionist goals is justified. The prophecy will be fulfilled by the return of the Messiah; and then, the final battle of Armageddon will follow during which millions of people, and the satanic forces aligned to Antichrist would be killed. Afterwards, the conversion of the Jews to Christ would take place. Whereas, the Jews believe that all humans will be destroyed except themselves. Any hostility to the state of Israel and its Jewish people equals animosity to God himself; (“I will bless those who bless you and curse those who curse you”). Christian Zionists, therefore, absolutely support the state of Israel disregarding any crimes committed by the Israelis against the native Palestinian inhabitants. This is translated into unlimited political, financial ($3-4 billion a year) and militarily support by the consecutive American governments influenced greatly by Zionism in the USA. Any criticism to Israel and its crimes is considered anti-Semitic.

The number of American Christian Zionists is estimated to be 20-26 millions, which constitutes the strongest support basis for Israel in the USA. They have supported the most radical Zionist leaders such as Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir, Ariel Sharon, and Benjamin Netanyahu, all of which refuse the return of occupied Arab lands, and plan for future expansions Ronald Reagan was a member of that group and received the votes of some 20 million Christian Zionists leading to his success in winning the American presidency twice. He provided unlimited support to Israel during his 8-year rule. As a result, Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982, occupied it for 20 years trying to push its northern borders to the Litany River, and expelled the Palestinian resistance. The expansion has failed as a result of the painful Israeli losses caused by Hezbollah’s resistance fighters.

Balfour Declaration:

David Lloyd George, a former British Prime Minister (1916), and his foreign secretary, Arthur James Balfour, belonged to Christian Zionism and were the first to legitimize the Zionist dream issuing the Balfour Declaration in 1917 giving the world Jews the right to establish a Jewish home land in Palestine disregarding the aboriginal Arab inhabitants. This document was the corner stone for the subsequent Zionist endeavors to materialize the Zionist vision.

The Prophecy’s Realization:

The establishment of the state of Israel was declared on 14 May 1948. All world powers have recognized it. The Arab armies were defeated by the Israelis twice in 1948 and 1967 loosing entire Palestine, the Sinai Desert, and Golan Heights. All these have provided Zionism with the illusion that the prophecy has started to materialize. This inflamed the American political, financial, and militarily support to the Israel.

Now, we are waiting for the fulfillment of the remaining of the prophecy, the appearance of the Messiah and then Armageddon final battle to have all non-Christians or non-Jews completely exterminated. The USA and some of its allies are playing the role of a catalyst trying to stimulate events in the Middle East to bring the world closer and closer to Armageddon. They think that they are playing the illusive game safely as their traditional and nuclear military powers seem to be invincible. They have succeeded in igniting most of the countries that might be involved in the Armageddon war. Afghanistan and Iraq are uncontrollably burning. Palestine and Lebanon are close to such conditions. The World War III seems to be close. Humanity, especially the very stupid one, seems to have never been tired of wars, destruction, pain, and suffer.

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: